Last Week's Results
1. Kiefer: 6
1. Chase: 6
3. H. Rousseau: 5
3. Ter Borch: 5
5. Cuyp: 3
5. Corot: 3
7. Poussin: 1
This Week's Contest
Alfred Wallis
1855 - 1942
British
Tournament Record: Tied for 251st. Lost to Warhol, beat Wadsworth, lost to Vlaminck. 14 votes for, 16 against (.467).
Jan Siberechts
1627 - 1703
Dutch; worked in Britain
Tournament Record: Tied for 251st. Beat Sickert, lost to Sheeler and Severini. 14 votes for, 16 against (.467).
Pieter De Hooch
1629 - 1684
Dutch
Tournament Record: Tied for 253rd. Beat van Honthorst and Homer (who recovered to place 7th!), lost to Varo, beat Hobbema, lost a rematch to Homer. 32 votes for, 37 against (.455).
Sir Edward Burne-Jones
1833 - 1898
British
Tournament Record: Placed 254th. Lost to Buren and Jan Bruegel the Elder. 13 votes for, 15 against (.464). Highest ranked 0-2 artist.
Henri Rousseau
1844 - 1910
French
Tournament Record: Tied for 255th. Beat Roubiliac, tied with Rubens, beat Sisley and Rossetti, lost to Sargent and Rivera. 32 votes for, 37 against (.464).
- Tied for Third in Week #103.
Gerard Ter Borch
1617 - 1681
Dutch
Tournament Record: Tied for 257th. Lost to Teniers, tied with Tanguy, beat Nolde, lost to Terbrugghen. 19 votes for, 22 against (.463).
- Tied for Third, Week #103.
Ferdinand Hodler
1853 - 1918
Swiss
Tournament Record: Placed 275th. Defeated Hans Hofmann, tied with Hockney, beat Goya, Lost to Hiroshige and Homer. 28 votes for, 34 against (.452).
- Placed First, Week #94.
- Placed First, Week #96.
- Placed First, Week #98.
- Tied for First, Week #100.
- Placed First, Week #102.
Hodler, and then I like the rest about equally so I will vote for none.
ReplyDeleteHodler, Hooch, Rousseau, and Siberechts.
ReplyDeleteRousseau, De Hooch, Ter Borch, and Hodler.
ReplyDeleteRousseau, Burne-Jones, de Hooch, Ter Borch.
ReplyDeleteHodler, De Hooch, Ter Borch, and Siberechts.
ReplyDeleteSame as Nora
ReplyDeleteOh hi! Susan, back in early May, said "VOTES: Jan Siberechts, Pieter De Hooch, Henri Rousseau & HODLER."
ReplyDeleteI'll say Hodler and Wallis, for myself.
ReplyDelete